Revit parametric modeling

I have been trying to do more with Revit massing and parametric family creations. They are useful in creating custom objects that can be "stretched" in many different ways.

I managed to use them in some limited ways like building precast panels and custom steel shapes. I feel there are so much more I can do with these tools. There are books and tutorial materials on this subject but it seems they cover more on the theory parts, less on examples or applications. For example, the confusing concept of "constrain" within families (or I guess my lack of understanding of it) has been one of the sources of my frustrations.

I thought webcast or webinar would be much better since it would allow people to see live action and listen to instant comments.

After the scouring the internet and AUGI forums, I found a good webcast tutorial at design reform (http://designreform.net).

The tutorial covers basic and more advanced family creations, among other things. The company apparently provides consulting services to businesses who want to get better in integrating or implementing multiple softwares/ technologies into more efficient design platform. The founders used to work at SHoP Architects, a well known New York architectural firm.

Pygmy style suspended bridge

I found an old 1930s footage of African's Pygmy tribe building a bridge over crocodiles infested river. It is quite amazing.

If you never heard about the Pygmies: they are ancient primitive tribe and short in statue (about 3 to 4 ft tall), live deep in the jungle and survive by means of hunting/gathering. (The footage interestingly shows the Pygmies eating raw elephant meat they killed). They are currently endangered because their way of living is cut short by land clearing and development. They are being forced out of the jungle and struggle mightily in adjusting to modern lifestyle which is totally foreign concept for them, for instance the use of currency and employment.

The bridge was built using some kind of woody vines and suspended between two large trees stretching several hundred feet across the river. Apparently the vines were bundled together to create a much stronger rope, similar concept to making wire ropes we use for bridges. The bridge needed to be suspended high above the river since it would experience sagging as much as 20 feet.

The Pygmies are very brave and amazing engineers, building the bridge vine by vine high up above the river while the hungry crocodiles patiently waiting under for possible feast.

You can watch the footage at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYvaA0Lz70A&feature=related

Pioneer of wind engineering died

Alan Davenport who is widely considered as the pioneer in wind design for tall buildings recently passed away. He was 76. He and his company RWDI in Ontario (Canada) have long dominated the field of wind tunnel testing and analysis for tall buildings and bridges, such as those for the New York Twin Towers and Sears Tower in Chicago.

Given the complex and dynamic nature of wind behaviors, if I am not mistaken, there are only two companies in North America who have the capability to perform detailed wind analysis and testing: Davenport's firm RWDI and CPP in Colorado.

One interesting side note about Davenport: he was commisioned by Sports Illustrated in 2002 to study the famous and unpredictable wind at the Augusta Golf Course area called "Amen Corner". He concluded what golfers already knew: change in golf course elevation in all directions (not to mention tree obstructions) causes havocs in wind movement.

The rest of the article can be read at this link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/science/26davenport.html?src=linkedin.

Save lives and billions.......with checklist

Back in early 2009, USA Today cited a interesting study published in New England Journal of Medicine. This study found that using a checklist during surgery reduced the number of deaths by more than 40 percent. It further said that if all hospitals used the same checklist, they could save tens of thousands of lives and $20 billion in medical costs.

The checklist has nothing to do with high tech procedures, instead, it focuses on basic safety measures and only covers 19 points out of hundreds of steps.
The beauty of it: it only takes two minutes to go through this checklist!

This article re-affirms my belief about how crucial it is to do a design checklist on every project. As an engineer I am not at the same level in terms of pay or precision as that of a surgeon, but, I can argue, many lives depend on the soundness of my work.

I have to admit that I, more often than not, so focus in analysis and problem solving that I forget, or have no time, to do basic but essential detailing and checking.

Simple check such as "Did I specify control joints and corner reinforcing in the concrete walls ?", or, "Have all header beams been checked for the loads coming from above?" are easy to remember but many of us are not good at remembering all of them all the time.
We already know that a project's success or failure often hinges on this kind of simple check, not on the brilliance of a high powered design. Missing simple details and notes often lead to confusions, construction delay, and, worse, structural problems that are costly to fix and increase our exposure to litigation.

The study also says checklist can be simple and short. Longer may be even better in my opinion. My checklist, which was originally developed from ACEC/CASE quality control checklist, only takes a maximum of twenty minutes to complete and covers three primary areas: plan and details , designs and calculations.
I do hesitate sometimes to complete and "submit" to my checklist, especially when deadline looms near and there is not a moment to waste. But, skipping it is not really an option either given its benefits.

I would say it is twenty minutes well spent. And, my clients deserve that.

Home Seismic Retrofit Program

For the past several months, I have been in more face to face interaction with homeowners and contractors through a wonderful program called Seattle Project Impact. I get to know some of them more at a personal level from direct discussions and correspondence back and forth, which I enjoy. I usually do not have that interaction with owners beyond sending invoices and thank you notes for received payment.

The Seattle Project Impact is a seismic hazard reduction program for homes initiated by a FEMA grant in 1990s. It aims to encourage homeowners to consider seismic retrofit for their older homes. Some incentives offered by the city of Seattle includes reduced fee and much faster permitting process, simplified and easy to understand retrofit procedure for DIY-ers (Do It Yourselfers), and, in many cases, no engineering design is required. So, it is quite simple and basic. Similar program was established earlier in Southern California cities and works well.

Free classes are also offered to teach homeowners how to do retrofit, go thrugh the check list and obtain the work permit themselves. I met the volunteering instructors, Tony Holder and Tom Hall, several months back and impressed with their work and commitments with this program. I decided to work with them and homeowners by offering engineering design, when required, at a reduced rate.

(The photo above shows Tom Hall and Tony Holder teaching at a class at the Greenwood Public Library in early October).

The underlying principle of this type of program is that, based on studies, older wood frame homes for the most parts are capable to absorb violent seismic shaking but still vulnerable at the crawl space or basement level where their perimeter walls, also called cripple walls, have little lateral strength. Under intense ground shaking, these homes could fall off its foundation or drop down several feet due to crushed cripple walls. Any of these damages are quite expensive, as much as $50,000, to fix. Retrofitting is relatively much cheaper and is a preventive measure to mitigate these costly damages. For DIYers, the material costs approximately $3,000 for a typical home. Hiring a trained retrofit contractor (who has taken the contractor's training class) costs from $5,000 to $15,000 depending on the complexity.

It seems that retrofitting is a smart long term investment and at a cost that is small fraction of the house value. Besides, homeowners may be required by insurance companies to get their houses retrofitted prior to obtaining earthquake insurance or seeking reduction in their premium.

There are more than 200,000 homes in King County are vulnerable to large earthquakes. In Seattle are alone-where ground shaking can be more intense due to soft soil condition- the number of vulnerable homes reaches 125,000. So far, not more than a thousand homes have been retrofitted; the good news is the program has been expanding. There are more than twenty cities in the Puget Sound area that have adopted this program.

If you are interested to learn about the program and the upcoming free classes you can check out this link: http://www.seattle.gov/emergency/info/retrofitclasses.htm or call 1-877-2-BOLT-IT to register for the class.

You can also contact me if you have any questions at basri@b2engineers.com.

Satsop: Before and Now

I was recently asked by a manufacturer to help engineer a conversion of a big empty building to a production facility in Satsop. For someone like me who have lived here less than 6 years, this place did not ring a bell; I even had trouble with the pronunciation. Then I was told by one of the staff that it is a giant but abandoned nuclear facility in Southwest Washington near Olympia. "It is pretty easy to find. You will see these giant concrete towers as you drive closer to the site," he said, maybe sensing my wondering thought.

I took a site visit last week. Sure enough, I saw these massive concrete tanks with blinking lights at the top as I was approaching the site. It is a big empty land with buildings clustered in the middle. I read about airplanes approaching Sea-Tac airport use these towers as a guide.

The building I am involved with is a heavy duty four story one. It is at least 1000 ft. long by 300 ft. wide with massive steel columns and beams. A lot of pits with wall thickness of 30 inches. The framings looked oversized to me but certainly appropriate for a nuclear facility. I am pretty sure seismic upgrade is not necessary.

Back in 1970s, this whole unfinished nuclear reactor facility cost billion of dollars. This is when gasoline was about 25 cents per gallon. The project was borned out of the desire of a utility company Washington Public Power Supply System to supply cheap energy to the public. The project broke ground in the late 70s, later faced stern public oppositions in 80s due to delay and ballooning construction cost, at that time estimated up to 8 billion dollars to complete. It was formally shut down in the early part of 90s. The utility company defaulted on $2.25 billion municipal bonds it sold to investors to fund the project. It was maybe the largest municipal bond default in the U.S. history.

Today, many of the buildings inside now-called Satsop Development Park are occupied by technology and distribution companies, manufacturers and training centers. It is a positive result of a program run by the Grays Harbor County to rejuvenate the local economy and make good use of this enormous facility. The county have been trying for many years to lure businesses to the site by offering favorable lease terms and capital improvement, among other incentives.

It apparently works pretty good.

If I borrow from the Obama's campaign theme, that is a positive change.

Growing Traffic Problem

I recently attended Bothell Chamber of Commerce luncheon. The speaker was Kemper Freeman Jr., a well known developer of Bellevue Square. He indicated that he has invested significant amount of time and money trying to promote ideas on relieving traffic congestion in Puget Sound area. He had also served as a legislator several years ago partly because, he said, he wanted to have his and other private citizens' voice heard in public decision makings.

During the presentation, Mr. Freeman admitted he has business interest in this issue in a way that a better traffic would boast the number of shoppers coming to his malls in Bellevue. But he quickly said, "We have much bigger issue, bad traffic will eventually ruin our economy and the standard of living here in Puget Sound."

I wholly agree with his assessment.

I do not know much about traffic engineering. But I do know we have traffic problem which is ranked among the nation's worst. I think many of us, unconsciously or not, plan our day and traveling around the traffic conditions.

It is likely getting even worse. By 2030 the Puget Sound population is predicted to increase by 40 percent. I am not sure how this area will cope with that amount growth in traffic.
Should we all stay home or work from home?

I have read a lot about the construction planning of the billion dollars light rail (and its massive cost overruns), but as a lay person I do not see how that will relieve or address traffic problem that is pretty widespread, from Everett in the north to Puyallup in the south. I think we need something much more comprehensive than that.

If you are interested to read more about traffic issue, there are several good website to check out. One is www.truthabouttraffic.org which studies the traffic congestion in Puget Sound.
You can also visit Mr. Freeman's website: www. freemanplan.com to learn more about his ideas.